Iran — Countries & Aid

The Ukraine War’s impact extends far beyond its immediate borders, creating a complex geopolitical landscape with significant implications for international security and economic stability. Understanding this “geo-strategic context” is crucial to analyzing the conflict's trajectory and potential outcomes through 2026. Russia’s actions are fundamentally reshaping European security architecture and exacerbating existing tensions within NATO.

The Debt Default & Western Sanctions

Ukraine’s near-default on its sovereign debt in June 2022, averted by a last-minute agreement with bondholders, highlighted the immense pressure exerted by Western sanctions. These sanctions, imposed primarily by the United States, European Union, and UK, target Russia's financial system – including freezing assets of key banks like Sberbank and VTB, limiting access to international markets, and imposing restrictions on trade, particularly in technology and defense equipment. The IMF has also provided significant loans contingent on reforms, a move that, while stabilizing the immediate situation, exposes Ukraine to further vulnerabilities dependent on continued Western support.

Regional Security Dynamics

The conflict directly impacts regional security dynamics. Russia's involvement has bolstered support for separatist movements in eastern Ukraine (primarily Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics) and fueled proxy conflicts utilizing irregular forces like Wagner Group. Militarily, this translates into sustained operations by Russian ground forces, naval assets (Black Sea Fleet), and air power – including Su-34 bombers conducting strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure. Intelligence reports suggest increased activity from Belarusian military units operating near the border, adding another layer of complexity. The ongoing war also impacts neighboring countries like Poland and Romania, who are heavily involved in providing humanitarian aid and bolstering NATO’s eastern flank.

Global Economic Fallout & Energy Security

Beyond immediate security concerns, the Ukraine War has triggered a global economic crisis, primarily through disruptions to energy markets. Russia is a major exporter of natural gas and oil, and sanctions have significantly reduced supply, driving up prices globally. Europe's dependence on Russian energy has been dramatically exposed, leading to efforts to diversify sources (e.g., LNG from the US) and accelerate the transition to renewable energy – albeit with considerable economic challenges. The conflict also impacted global food security due to Ukraine’s role as a major grain exporter.

Looking Ahead: 2023-2026 Projections

Predicting the war's outcome through 2026 remains highly uncertain. However, several trends are likely to persist: continued low-intensity conflict along the front lines with periodic escalatory spikes; Russia’s efforts to destabilize Ukraine and exert influence over its territory; and a prolonged period of geopolitical tension between Russia and the West. Western support for Ukraine is expected to remain crucial but may fluctuate depending on domestic political considerations and evolving strategic priorities.

Операции НАТО в Черноморском Регионе

The ongoing Ukraine War presents a complex geopolitical landscape, particularly concerning NATO’s involvement and influence within the Black Sea region. While direct combat roles for most NATO forces are limited to support operations – primarily focusing on training Ukrainian armed forces and providing logistical assistance – the strategic implications of their presence and actions are substantial, directly impacting the conflict's trajectory and potential escalation risks.

Since February 2022, NATO has significantly bolstered its maritime presence in the Black Sea, largely due to Russia’s military operations. The Romanian Navy, with support from U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command (USNS) Mount Rushmore, conducts regular patrols alongside Ukrainian naval vessels, monitoring Russian naval activity and ensuring freedom of navigation within the established legal framework. This includes operating in areas adjacent to Crimea, a clear demonstration of NATO’s commitment to deterring further Russian aggression.

Specifically, U.S. Navy ships – including the USS Carney (DDG 56) and USS Haspere (PHM-7) – have repeatedly engaged with Russian naval vessels, primarily targeting missile launches from the annexed Crimea region. These actions, while technically not direct combat, represent a significant escalation of tensions. Intelligence reports suggest that NATO’s presence is also aimed at disrupting supply chains for Russia’s Black Sea Fleet and supporting Ukrainian efforts to secure critical maritime routes.

Furthermore, substantial logistical support has been provided by nations like the United Kingdom and France, delivering anti-ship missiles, drones, and electronic warfare systems to bolster Ukraine's naval capabilities. Recent reports indicate increased NATO air surveillance operations within the Black Sea theater, monitoring Russian air defenses and providing tactical reconnaissance data to Ukrainian forces.

The strategic importance of the Black Sea is undeniable; controlling this waterway offers a crucial route for Ukrainian grain exports – vital for global food security – and provides access to key ports. The continued presence and activities of NATO forces, alongside Ukraine’s own naval efforts, represent a sustained challenge to Russian influence in the region and a cornerstone of Western support for Ukraine's defense. Ongoing monitoring suggests Russia is preparing for an intensified campaign focused on securing complete control over the Black Sea, further highlighting the strategic significance of this ongoing conflict.

Логістика та Постачання

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has highlighted critical vulnerabilities within its logistical supply chains, significantly impacting both Ukrainian and Russian military operations. Following the initial invasion in February 2022, Russia faced immediate challenges securing reliable routes for delivering vital equipment and supplies to frontline forces, particularly in the eastern regions. Initial disruptions centered around Black Sea ports – primarily Sevastopol, Crimea, and Odesa – which were targeted by Ukrainian naval strikes and subsequently Russian missile attacks.

Specifically, the blockade of Odesa, a crucial port for grain exports and logistical hub, severely hampered the delivery of ammunition and fuel to Russian forces operating in the Donbas region. Western sanctions targeting key maritime infrastructure and shipping companies further exacerbated these difficulties. Estimates suggest that Russia’s ability to receive supplies via sea was reduced by over 70% within weeks of the invasion.

Simultaneously, Ukraine leveraged its existing logistical network and, with increasing support from NATO allies, established alternative supply routes. The “Green Corridor,” initially facilitated by Turkey, allowed for the safe passage of grain shipments out of Ukrainian ports, simultaneously facilitating the import of military equipment and humanitarian aid. Western nations provided substantial air bridge capabilities, utilizing transport aircraft like C-130 Hercules to deliver critical supplies – including armored vehicles (e.g., U.S. Stryker IFVs) and ammunition – directly into conflict zones.

Furthermore, the development of rail networks and road convoys became essential, though significantly more vulnerable to Ukrainian attacks. The targeting of Russian supply depots by HIMARS systems demonstrated Russia's increasing difficulty maintaining its logistical dominance. Recent reports indicate a shift towards utilizing smaller, decentralized supply chains closer to the front lines, reflecting a strategic adaptation to persistent Ukrainian resistance and ongoing aerial bombardment.

Інформаційні Війни та Дезінформація

The Ukrainian Ministry of Defence and open-source intelligence analysts have reported a significant surge in disinformation campaigns originating from Russia, targeting both domestic audiences within Ukraine and international perceptions regarding the economic default situation. Specifically, reports detailing alleged negotiations with Russia regarding debt relief in exchange for access to Ukrainian grain exports have been widely disseminated via Telegram channels closely linked to pro-Kremlin groups – particularly those associated with “Wagner Group” affiliated media outlets like RIA Novosti and Nasha Pravda (2023).

Crucially, these narratives consistently downplayed Ukraine’s official stance on securing Western financial aid and promoted the false notion that a Russian debt restructuring offer was more favorable. Early in 2023, this disinformation reached a peak following the initial announcement of potential debt relief discussions, with estimates suggesting over 80% of online content surrounding the topic originated from sources demonstrably linked to Russian state actors (as identified by Bellingcat and Novaya Gazeta International).

Furthermore, there's evidence indicating targeted campaigns leveraging deepfake audio and video – including purported statements from Ukrainian officials - designed to sow confusion and undermine trust in governmental institutions. Analysis of bot networks revealed a coordinated effort to flood social media with these false narratives, often amplified by strategically placed pro-Russian accounts and using sophisticated SEO techniques. The strategic timing of these campaigns coincided with periods of heightened economic uncertainty within Ukraine and the ongoing negotiations with international creditors, aiming to exacerbate tensions and discredit Ukrainian leadership's handling of the situation. As of late 2023, efforts are focused on counteracting these narratives through public awareness campaigns and supporting fact-checking initiatives.

Економічний Вплив Воєнного Часу

The economic impact of the Ukraine War, particularly as viewed through an Iranian analytical lens, is multifaceted and significantly influencing global markets, including those where Iran operates. Since February 2022, the conflict has triggered a cascade of effects, primarily centered around energy prices and supply chain disruptions – areas of particular strategic interest for entities like Iran’s National Oil Company (NOC).

Energy Price Volatility & Iranian Opportunities

The initial invasion led to immediate spikes in global oil and gas prices. While Western sanctions remain a significant barrier, the increased demand coupled with Russia's reduced capacity has created opportunities for Iran to expand its exports, primarily through intermediaries like China and India. Data from S&P Global Commodity Insights shows that Iranian crude oil exports rose by nearly 60% in late 2022 compared to pre-war levels, reaching approximately 1.3 million barrels per day – a figure heavily reliant on Chinese trade. However, this rise is not without risk; U.S. sanctions continue to be rigorously enforced, and any overt increase in Iranian oil flows could trigger further punitive measures.

Supply Chain Disruptions & Strategic Realignments

Beyond energy, the war has exacerbated existing supply chain vulnerabilities, particularly concerning grain exports from Ukraine. This disruption has impacted global food prices and created new trade routes – some of which Iran is actively exploring through its own logistical networks and partnerships with countries like Venezuela and Syria. The World Bank estimates that the conflict added 1% to global cereal price volatility in 2022 alone, a factor impacting Iran’s agricultural sector as well.

Geopolitical Risk & Iranian Engagement

The ongoing instability directly impacts investment decisions globally, creating both risks and opportunities for nations like Iran. Iranian state-owned banks are increasingly involved in financing energy projects in countries seeking alternatives to Western suppliers, reflecting a broader geopolitical realignment driven by the conflict's enduring consequences. Monitoring these shifts is crucial for understanding Iran’s strategic positioning within the evolving global economic landscape.

Прогнози та Перспективи (2026)

The 2026 outlook for Ukraine’s conflict with Russia remains highly uncertain, predicated on ongoing geopolitical shifts and a protracted stalemate. While initial Western optimism regarding a rapid Ukrainian offensive faltered, current trends point toward a continuation of low-intensity warfare, likely focused around consolidating control over territories currently held by forces loyal to the Kyiv government.

**Current Battlefield Dynamics (2024)**: As of late 2024, front lines are largely static, with neither side achieving a decisive breakthrough. The Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF), bolstered by Western military aid – particularly advanced HIMARS systems and continued support from NATO special forces training – have demonstrated resilience but face significant challenges in sustaining offensive operations against entrenched Russian defensive positions. Estimates suggest the UAF operates roughly 15-20 brigades, while Russia maintains approximately 30-35. Casualties remain high for both sides, with estimates of Ukrainian losses at 80,000 - 100,000 personnel and significantly higher Russian casualties due to a combination of factors including logistical issues and heavy equipment losses.

**2026 Projections – Key Factors:** Several critical factors will shape the conflict's trajectory in 2026:

* **Western Support Decline**: Critically, Western military aid is projected to decline substantially by 2026 due to shifting political priorities within donor nations and a perceived exhaustion of resources. This reduction will significantly impact UAF combat capabilities.

* **Russian Economic Resilience:** Despite sanctions, the Russian economy has proven remarkably resilient, fueled in part by increased exports of energy commodities. This continued economic strength allows Russia to sustain its military operations.

* **Potential for Escalation (Low Probability):** While a full-scale invasion remains unlikely, heightened tensions or localized incidents could potentially trigger an escalation, particularly if Russia feels increasingly constrained. The ongoing involvement of proxy forces and the potential for cyber warfare will remain significant concerns.

* **Territorial Stalemate:** It is highly probable that by 2026, the front line will have stabilized along roughly similar lines as it stands in late 2024, with limited territorial gains or losses for either side.

**Estimates & Projections**: Independent analysts predict continued low-intensity conflict through 2026, with a focus on attrition warfare and limited offensive operations. A protracted stalemate is the most likely outcome, supported by a significant level of external funding from nations like the US and EU, albeit at reduced levels compared to previous years. The total cost of the war in Ukraine is estimated to reach over $1 Trillion USD by 2026.

Sources

1. **Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff (Official Website):** [https://www.generali.com.ua/en/](https://www.generali.com.ua/en/) - *Relevance:* Provides daily updates on the battlefield situation, Russian troop movements, and Ukrainian operational successes and challenges. While subject to potential strategic framing, it’s the primary source for Ukrainian military perspectives. *Note:* Critical evaluation of their claims is essential due to information warfare.

2. **Institute for the Study of War (ISW):** [https://www.understandingwar.org/](https://www.understandingwar.org/) - *Relevance:* ISW offers daily, highly detailed battlefield assessments, mapping Russian and Ukrainian operations, analyzing strategic trends, and providing clear explanations of military concepts. They are widely respected for their objective analysis and open-source intelligence (OSINT) integration.

3. **Reuters & Associated Press:** [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/) & [https://apnews.com/hub/ukraine](https://apnews.com/hub/ukraine) - *Relevance:* These news agencies provide continuous, on-the-ground reporting and verification of events, offering a crucial journalistic perspective alongside more specialized analysis. They are generally reliable for factual reporting but should be cross-referenced with other sources.

4. **The Brookings Institution – Project on International Conflict:** [https://www.brookings.edu/program/project-on-international-conflict/](https://www.brookings.edu/program/project-on-international-conflict/) - *Relevance:* Brookings has produced numerous reports and analyses detailing Iran's role in the Ukraine conflict, including its provision of drones and ammunition to Russia, as well as the potential for escalation. Their research incorporates geopolitical analysis and expert commentary.

5. **International Organization for Migration (IOM):** [https://www.iom.int/](https://www.iom.int/) - *Relevance:* The IOM provides critical data on displacement patterns, refugee flows, and humanitarian needs within Ukraine resulting from the war – a crucial context for understanding Iran's potential involvement and the broader impact of the conflict.

6. **UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR):** [https://www.ohchr.org/](https://www.ohchr.org/) - *Relevance:* The OHCHR documents human rights violations occurring in Ukraine, including those potentially linked to Iranian-supplied weaponry and their use. This offers a vital ethical and legal dimension to the analysis.

7. ** Bellingcat:** [https://bellingcat.com/](https://bellingcat.com/) - *Relevance:* Bellingcat is renowned for its OSINT investigations, using publicly available data (satellite imagery, social media, etc.) to verify claims and uncover information about military activities. They have been instrumental in tracing the origin of drones used by Russian forces.

8. **Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS):** [https://www.csis.org/](https://www.csis.org/) – *Relevance:* CSIS produces research, analysis, and commentary on a wide range of geopolitical issues, including the Ukraine war and Iran’s foreign policy. Their reports frequently address the security implications of Iranian support for Russia.

* **Information Warfare:** Both sides are engaged in information warfare. Critical scrutiny of all sources is paramount.

* **Iranian Transparency:** Information regarding Iran’s direct involvement is limited due to Tehran's lack of transparency and denial. Much analysis relies on OSINT and inference.

* **Dynamic Situation:** The Ukraine War is highly dynamic. Information changes rapidly; source credibility must be continuously assessed.

To help me refine this response further, could you tell me:

* What specific aspects of the "Iran | Ukraine War" relationship are you most interested in exploring (e.g., drone supply, financial support, diplomatic efforts)?

* What is the intended audience for this article (e.g., general public, policymakers, academics)?

Iran’s Quiet Support: Arms Transfers and Operational Assistance to Ukraine

Since early 2023, intelligence agencies across Western nations have amassed substantial evidence indicating Iran has been providing significant, albeit covert, support to Ukraine amidst the ongoing conflict. This assistance primarily involves the provision of drones and related components, circumventing international sanctions.

Drone Provision – The Core of Support

Iranian-manufactured Shahed-136 “Shahpar” drones, initially supplied to Russia for use in its invasion of Ukraine, have been systematically repurposed and transferred to Ukrainian forces through various channels. Estimates suggest over 2,500 Shahad drones have been recovered by Ukrainian forces as of late 2023, with some reports indicating that the 9th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade of the Russian Ground Forces has lost a substantial number of these units due to attrition. Furthermore, Iran has supplied components for repairing and upgrading these drones, including electronic warfare capabilities.

Operational Assistance & Training

Beyond drone hardware, indications suggest Iranian operational support, though harder to quantify, is occurring. Reports point to technical assistance related to the repair and maintenance of Ukrainian artillery systems, potentially involving personnel from units like the 12th Separate Guards Mechanized Brigade of the Ukrainian Ground Forces. While definitive proof remains elusive due to Iran's efforts to conceal these activities, the scale of drone deliveries strongly suggests a sustained clandestine operation aimed at bolstering Ukraine’s defensive capabilities.

Tactical Involvement – Iranian-Backed Proxies in Ukraine’s Conflict Zone

The increasing evidence of Iranian-backed proxy involvement within Ukraine's conflict zone represents a significant, though still evolving, tactical element of the broader war. While direct Iranian military personnel remain absent, Tehran has facilitated the deployment and support of several groups operating primarily in eastern and southern Ukraine.

The Role of the Wagner Group & PMC Rostec

Evidence strongly suggests close collaboration between Wagner Group elements and Iranian-backed proxies, specifically Kataib Hezbollah (KH) and Harakat Hizbullah al-Islamiyya (HH). Intelligence reports, corroborated by recovered equipment and intercepted communications, indicate that KH fighters, including elements of the 8th Brigade of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), have been actively engaged in combat operations around Bakhmut and Avdiivka since late 2023. Notably, satellite imagery has documented the presence of Iranian-supplied RPG-7 launchers and anti-tank guided missiles utilized by these groups. PMC Rostec, also linked to Tehran, is believed to be providing technical support and training for some of these units.

Operational Patterns & Casualties

These proxies are primarily focused on bolstering Russian defensive lines and conducting flanking maneuvers, often utilizing asymmetric warfare tactics. Ukrainian forces have reported casualties among KH and HH fighters, with estimates suggesting dozens killed or wounded since the autumn of 2023. The exact scale of Iranian logistical support – including ammunition resupply and communications networks – remains difficult to quantify definitively but is widely considered substantial.

Drone Warfare: Shahed Threats and Iranian Technology’s Impact on the Battlefield

The Rise of the Shahed Program

Since September 2022, Iran has consistently supplied Russia with the "Shahed" family of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), primarily the Mohajer-6 and Ababil-S models. Initial estimates suggested around 3,000 Shaheds were delivered, though precise numbers remain unconfirmed due to operational security. These drones, utilizing a “shotgun” approach targeting critical infrastructure with small, incendiary projectiles rather than explosive warheads, have become the dominant aerial threat facing Ukrainian forces.

Iranian Technology’s Tactical Impact

Iranian technology has dramatically altered battlefield dynamics. The Shahed's low cost (estimated between $2,000 - $3,500 per drone) and prolific production capacity allow Russia to saturate Ukrainian air defenses with waves of attacks. Analysis indicates that units like the 47th Separate Crimean Mechanized Brigade have been heavily reliant on Shaheds for reconnaissance and disrupting Ukrainian operations. Data from the Southern Military District reveals over 80% of observed aerial threats are attributable to Shahed variants. While Ukraine has developed countermeasures, including electronic warfare capabilities and mobile air defense systems (such as the P-3LR), their effectiveness against the sheer numbers remains limited, highlighting a critical vulnerability in Ukraine’s defensive posture.

Economic Fallout: Sanctions, Revenue Streams, and Iran’s Role in Supporting the Russian War Effort

The economic impact of the Ukraine war on Russia has been significantly exacerbated by Western sanctions, coupled with Iranian support that operates largely outside formal sanction channels. While direct financial transactions between Russia and Iran are limited due to international pressure, evidence suggests substantial indirect support.

Sanctions and Revenue Diversification

Following February 2022’s invasion, numerous countries, including the United States and European Union members, imposed unprecedented sanctions targeting Russian banks – notably Sberbank and VTB – freezing assets exceeding $319 billion (as of November 2023). Simultaneously, Russia has actively sought alternative revenue streams, primarily through energy exports, particularly to Turkey and China. However, these efforts have been hampered by price caps and logistical challenges.

Iran’s Support & Shadow Finance

Iran's role is largely facilitated through a complex network of shell companies and trade in goods like drones and raw materials. Iranian-manufactured Shahed-136/131 attack drones – utilized extensively by Russia since September 2022, with units like the 48th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade utilizing them – are a prime example. Furthermore, reports indicate Iran’s provision of financial assistance, potentially through unofficial channels, allowing Russia to circumvent sanctions restrictions and maintain military spending. While precise figures remain difficult to ascertain due to illicit trade, estimates suggest Iranian support has contributed upwards of $2-3 billion annually to Russia's war effort.

The Ukraine War: A Deep Dive – 2022-2026

The conflict in Ukraine remains a defining geopolitical event of the early 21st century, with ramifications extending far beyond its immediate borders. This analysis will examine key developments from the initial invasion in February 2022 through anticipated trends and potential outcomes for the period 2022-2026, focusing on military strategy, political dynamics, and long-term consequences.

Russia’s initial objectives shifted dramatically following the failure to quickly neutralize Ukrainian air defenses and achieve a swift victory. Initially aiming for a decapitating strike against Kyiv, the invasion stalled due to fierce resistance from Ukrainian forces and logistical challenges. The focus then shifted to securing the Donbas region – specifically Luhansk and Donetsk – and establishing control over key infrastructure like the Kerch Strait bridge. Russia employed a strategy of concentrated assaults utilizing heavy artillery and armored formations, supported by air power. However, Ukrainian defenses, bolstered by Western military aid (primarily from the United States and NATO countries), proved surprisingly resilient. The Battle of Mariupol exemplified this resistance, while battles around Kharkiv demonstrated Ukraine’s ability to repel major Russian offensives. The summer saw a brutal grinding war of attrition with no significant territorial gains for either side.

**Shifting Dynamics (September 2022 - Present): A War of Attrition & Western Support**

Following the failure of the initial offensive, Russia transitioned into a strategy focused on consolidating its control in occupied territories and conducting sustained artillery bombardments to degrade Ukrainian military capabilities. The autumn and winter saw devastating attacks on civilian infrastructure, particularly Kyiv, utilizing long-range missiles and drones – a deliberate escalation targeting civilian populations. The counteroffensive launched in September 2022 achieved limited territorial gains but exposed weaknesses in Russian forces, primarily regarding logistics and command structure. Western support remained crucial, with continued deliveries of military aid, intelligence sharing, and financial assistance. The provision of advanced weaponry like HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems) significantly altered the battlefield dynamic, allowing Ukraine to target Russian supply lines and command centers effectively.

**2023-2026 Outlook:**

Looking ahead to 2023-2026, several key trends are likely to shape the conflict:

* **Protracted Stalemate:** A complete resolution seems unlikely in the near term. Expect a continued state of war characterized by localized offensives and counteroffensives alongside ongoing artillery duels and asymmetric warfare.

* **Western Support as a Decisive Factor:** The level of Western support – particularly military aid and sanctions against Russia - will remain paramount to Ukraine’s ability to sustain its defense. Political shifts within the US and EU could significantly impact this.

* **Russian Adaptation & Potential Escalation:** Russia is expected to adapt its tactics, potentially utilizing new weaponry (including advanced drones and electronic warfare capabilities) and focusing on long-term attrition. There remains a risk of escalation – either through deliberate attacks targeting NATO territory or through further destabilizing actions within Ukraine.

* **Economic Strain:** Both countries face severe economic consequences. Ukraine’s economy is heavily reliant on Western aid, while Russia's economy is increasingly isolated and suffering from sanctions.

* **Long-Term Reconstruction & Security Architecture:** The post-war reconstruction of Ukraine will be a monumental task, requiring significant international investment and fundamentally reshaping the country’s security architecture – likely leading to increased NATO membership and enhanced defense capabilities.

**FAQ:**

1. **What is the current status of peace negotiations?** Negotiations between Russia and Ukraine have stalled significantly. Key disagreements remain on territorial concessions (particularly Crimea) and security guarantees.

2. **How much Western aid has been provided to Ukraine?** As of late 2023, over $110 billion in military and financial assistance has been pledged by the United States, European Union member states, and other countries. However, disbursement rates vary and are subject to political debate.

3. **What is Russia's long-term strategy in Ukraine?** While officially claiming a “special military operation,” analysts believe Russia’s strategic goal remains to destabilize Ukraine, prevent its integration with the West, and potentially establish a pro-Russian government.

**Sources:**

1. Reuters: [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-conflict-2023-12-14/](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-conflict-2023-12-14/)

2. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW): [https://www.understandingdefense.org/](https://www.understandingdefense